home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ Columbia Kermit / kermit.zip / newsgroups / misc.20021006-20030409 / 000009_flo@uk.thalesgroup.com_Tue Oct 8 12:28:09 EDT 2002.msg < prev    next >
Text File  |  2020-01-01  |  2KB  |  36 lines

  1. Article: 13771 of comp.protocols.kermit.misc
  2. Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!panix!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!lnewspeer00.lnd.ops.eu.uu.net!emea.uu.net!news!not-for-mail
  3. From: Paul Williams <flo@uk.thalesgroup.com>
  4. Newsgroups: comp.arch.embedded,comp.protocols.kermit.misc
  5. Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Embedded Kermit File-Transfer Protocol
  6. Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 17:19:06 +0100
  7. Organization: speaking for myself
  8. Lines: 14
  9. Message-ID: <3DA3057A.97E676F2@uk.thalesgroup.com>
  10. References: <anqinh$ais$1@watsol.cc.columbia.edu> <gjv1quoadrqg25t2n2hkl6csu0isgcaah8@4ax.com> <ans3kn$c9k$1@watsol.cc.columbia.edu> <ufe3qu0k1cggfgci7cr5kgtrqea8ek5qv6@4ax.com> <ansih9$j7n$1@watsol.cc.columbia.edu>
  11. NNTP-Posting-Host: sswc019.int.rdel.co.uk
  12. Mime-Version: 1.0
  13. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  14. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
  15. X-Trace: rdel.co.uk 1034093946 7723 172.21.150.60 (8 Oct 2002 16:19:06 GMT)
  16. X-Complaints-To: postmaster@uk.thalesgroup.com
  17. NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Oct 2002 16:19:06 GMT
  18. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.6 sun4m)
  19. X-Accept-Language: en
  20. Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.arch.embedded:138574 comp.protocols.kermit.misc:13771
  21.  
  22. Frank da Cruz wrote:
  23. > That's great for devices that can include a TCP/IP stack and a
  24. > suite of applications and servers, but that's not usually the case
  25. > for fast-food cash registers, cardiac pacemakers, drill presses,
  26. > etc.  Nor would you necessarily want it to be -- I wouldn't want
  27. > Internet hackers taking over my cash register, my pacemaker, or my
  28. > drill press.
  29.  
  30. Of course, anyone concerned with dispelling misconceptions would
  31. probably not want to equate TCP/IP connectivity with being on the
  32. Internet.
  33.  
  34. - Paul
  35.